Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i7-4702MQ
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
145.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
18.98k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
9.5k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.32k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
3.99k (x1.03)
TOTAL
38.85k
36.8k (x0.95)
Multithread
3200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
74.75k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
47.72k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
19.65k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.02k (x0.74)
TOTAL
61.23k
145.15k (x2.37)
Performance/W
3200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4