Ryzen 3 3200U vs 3250U
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Dali
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
9.33k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
17.1k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.57k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
3.26k (x0.84)
TOTAL
38.85k
33.26k (x0.86)
Multithread
3200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
22.14k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
40.04k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
10.71k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5k (x1.22)
TOTAL
61.23k
77.88k (x1.27)
Performance/W
3200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4