Ryzen 3 3200U vs A10 9630P
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 9630P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 9630P gets 32.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
660f51
Core
Picasso
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
23.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
32.92k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
8.52k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
11.04k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
2.36k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
1.79k (x0.46)
TOTAL
38.85k
23.7k (x0.61)
Multithread
3200U
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
12.83k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
14.44k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
3.6k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
2.05k (x0.5)
TOTAL
61.23k
32.92k (x0.54)
Performance/W
3200U
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
285 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
321 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
732 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
9630P
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
543 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
7183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4