Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 8.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 8.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806d1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
24.09k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
19.54k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
8.48k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
11.68k (x3.02)
TOTAL
38.85k
63.79k (x1.64)
Multithread
3200U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
220.79k (x12.89)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
225.98k (x7.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
79.1k (x8.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
11.32k (x2.77)
TOTAL
61.23k
537.18k (x8.77)
Performance/W
3200U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4