Ryzen 3 3200G vs ARM M1
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the M1 is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the M1 gets 142.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the M1 gets 142.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
f4a
Core
Picasso
-
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
- kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
- kB
Date
July 2019
January 1900
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
41.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
142.32k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
9.46k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
24.42k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
3.76k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.8k (x0.58)
TOTAL
48k
41.44k (x0.86)
Multithread
3200G
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
34.73k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
87.52k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
13.74k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.34k (x0.96)
TOTAL
165.91k
142.32k (x0.86)
Performance/W
3200G
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W