| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Picasso
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8448 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.97k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
14.5k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.78k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
8.19k (x1.24)
TOTAL
33.79k
31.45k (x0.93)

Multithread

3200G

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
15.56k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
59.23k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
22.87k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
6.85k (x1.05)
TOTAL
108.01k
104.51k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
25.09k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
20.76k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.07k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
8.76k (x1.6)
TOTAL
49.21k
59.68k (x1.21)

Multithread

3200G

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
111.43k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
100.2k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
24.67k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.89k (x1.26)
TOTAL
168.69k
243.18k (x1.44)

Performance/W
3200G
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
3200G
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4