Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-4640
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 3.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 166.8 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 3.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
206d7
Core
Picasso
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
8 /16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
610.16k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
1.66k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
5.26k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
2.13k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
2.53k (x0.38)
TOTAL
33.79k
11.58k (x0.34)
Multithread
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
77.64k (x5.15)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
212.2k (x3.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
113.11k (x5.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
7.54k (x1.15)
TOTAL
108.01k
410.48k (x3.8)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
6.19k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
5.89k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
2.11k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
2.51k (x0.38)
TOTAL
48k
16.7k (x0.35)
Multithread
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
244.88k (x4.42)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
215.35k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
114.64k (x5.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.76k (x1.03)
TOTAL
165.91k
581.63k (x3.51)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
5.01k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
4.5k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
2.18k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
2.19k (x0.3)
TOTAL
48.63k
13.88k (x0.29)
Multithread
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
251.29k (x4.86)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
236.61k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
114.89k (x5.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
7.36k (x1.12)
TOTAL
166.79k
610.16k (x3.66)
Performance/W
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
796 points/W
2645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1350 points/W
2491 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
2566 points/W
6423 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
3262 points/GHz
1790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5719 points/GHz
1609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1348 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
782 points/GHz
TOTAL
12157 points/GHz
4957 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4