Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Picasso
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
343.64k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13.1k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
11.91k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.83k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
3.83k (x0.52)
TOTAL
48.63k
33.68k (x0.69)
Multithread
3200G
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
105.42k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
109.99k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
44.56k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
17.7k (x2.69)
TOTAL
166.79k
277.66k (x1.66)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
20.99k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
11.9k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.72k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
3.75k (x0.69)
TOTAL
49.21k
41.36k (x0.84)
Multithread
3200G
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
172.62k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
110.03k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
44.06k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
16.93k (x3.09)
TOTAL
168.69k
343.64k (x2.04)
Performance/W
3200G
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4