Ryzen 3 3200G vs Pentium G4560
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.8 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.8 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.01k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
18.74k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.06k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
7.4k (x1.12)
TOTAL
48k
44.21k (x0.92)
Multithread
3200G
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
27.22k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
43.79k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
11.74k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
7.16k (x1.09)
TOTAL
165.91k
89.91k (x0.54)
Performance/W
3200G
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1279 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
319 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
2552 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3574 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1354 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1650 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
12000 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4