Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Picasso
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/4
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.52k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.94k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.5k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
9.64k (x1.46)
TOTAL
33.79k
37.6k (x1.11)
Multithread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
84.93k (x5.64)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
409.55k (x6.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
122.88k (x6.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
22.12k (x3.38)
TOTAL
108.01k
639.48k (x5.92)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.03k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
23.95k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
6.03k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
9.37k (x1.42)
TOTAL
48k
55.38k (x1.15)
Multithread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
316.11k (x5.7)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
503.75k (x6.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
131.82k (x6.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
22.24k (x3.38)
TOTAL
165.91k
973.92k (x5.87)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
16.4k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
20.97k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
5.82k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
8.86k (x1.21)
TOTAL
48.63k
52.05k (x1.07)
Multithread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
316.84k (x6.12)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
461.09k (x5.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
129.82k (x6.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
22.09k (x3.36)
TOTAL
166.79k
929.85k (x5.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
29.53k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.59k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.99k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
10.22k (x1.87)
TOTAL
49.21k
68.33k (x1.39)
Multithread
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
587.06k (x10.79)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
496.41k (x5.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
134.66k (x6.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
22.99k (x4.2)
TOTAL
168.69k
1241.12k (x7.36)
Performance/W
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4