Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-7700HQ
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
208.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.82k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
15.49k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.96k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
8.82k (x1.33)
TOTAL
33.79k
33.09k (x0.98)
Multithread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
14.15k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
65.81k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
22.41k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
5.21k (x0.8)
TOTAL
108.01k
107.57k (x1)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.75k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
19.69k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.19k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
8.92k (x1.35)
TOTAL
48k
47.55k (x0.99)
Multithread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
52.55k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
86.47k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
23.02k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
5.4k (x0.82)
TOTAL
165.91k
167.43k (x1.01)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
13k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
20.34k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
4.77k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
6.95k (x0.95)
TOTAL
48.63k
45.05k (x0.93)
Multithread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
52.7k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
89.69k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
22.49k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
4.3k (x0.65)
TOTAL
166.79k
169.17k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
23.27k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
20.35k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.76k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
7.92k (x1.45)
TOTAL
49.21k
56.29k (x1.14)
Multithread
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
93.11k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
89.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
21.29k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
4.9k (x0.89)
TOTAL
168.69k
208.33k (x1.23)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
4629 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4