Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-6900K
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 2.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406f1
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
23.11k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
17.84k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.34k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
3.47k (x0.64)
TOTAL
49.21k
49.76k (x1.01)
Multithread
3200G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
184.19k (x3.39)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
181.2k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
47.44k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
14.69k (x2.68)
TOTAL
168.69k
427.51k (x2.53)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4