Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-6700
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6700 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
57.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
243.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
24.83k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
21.82k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.98k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
6.14k (x1.12)
TOTAL
49.21k
57.76k (x1.17)
Multithread
3200G
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
109.79k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
102.39k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
24.72k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.51k (x1.19)
TOTAL
168.69k
243.4k (x1.44)
Performance/W
3200G
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3745 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6206 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4