Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-8600
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8600 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-8600 gets 317.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8600 is 1.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-8600 gets 317.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8600 is 1.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
70.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
317.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
28.14k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
24.71k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.51k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
11.95k (x2.19)
TOTAL
49.21k
70.3k (x1.43)
Multithread
3200G
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
159.4k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
126.93k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
26.76k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
4.4k (x0.8)
TOTAL
168.69k
317.49k (x1.88)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1953 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
412 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
4884 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5746 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1281 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16350 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4