Ryzen 3 3200G vs Engineering Sample 906EC
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 906EC is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 2.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 2.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ec
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
494.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
28.3k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
24.99k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.55k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
11.71k (x2.14)
TOTAL
49.21k
70.55k (x1.43)
Multithread
3200G
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
229.27k (x4.21)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
209.21k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
48.53k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.23k (x1.32)
TOTAL
168.69k
494.24k (x2.93)
Performance/W
3200G
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W