Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 4.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 4.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
870f10
Core
Picasso
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
4.46k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.46k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
8.05k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
23.71k (x3.58)
TOTAL
33.79k
54.68k (x1.62)
Multithread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
52.65k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
265.41k (x3.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
140.78k (x7.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
46.91k (x7.17)
TOTAL
108.01k
505.76k (x4.68)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
17.35k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
25.87k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
8.72k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
27.86k (x4.22)
TOTAL
48k
79.8k (x1.66)
Multithread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
201.57k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
284.41k (x3.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
145.16k (x6.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
100.56k (x15.29)
TOTAL
165.91k
731.7k (x4.41)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
16.95k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
25.37k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.23k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
24.83k (x3.4)
TOTAL
48.63k
76.38k (x1.57)
Multithread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
196.31k (x3.79)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
290.5k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
143.95k (x6.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
64.92k (x9.88)
TOTAL
166.79k
695.69k (x4.17)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
16.73k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
24.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
8.82k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
22.22k (x4.07)
TOTAL
49.21k
72.51k (x1.47)
Multithread
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
248.24k (x4.56)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
309.66k (x3.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
140.01k (x6.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
58.39k (x10.66)
TOTAL
168.69k
756.3k (x4.48)
Performance/W
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4