Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 7 4700U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
269.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
10.38k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.63k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
8.52k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
7.99k (x1.46)
TOTAL
49.21k
49.53k (x1.01)
Multithread
3200G
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
86.74k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
128.69k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
48.71k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.41k (x0.99)
TOTAL
168.69k
269.56k (x1.6)
Performance/W
3200G
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
17970 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4