Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 5500
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 2.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
373.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
15.32k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
22.98k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.3k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
21.19k (x2.9)
TOTAL
48.63k
68.8k (x1.41)
Multithread
3200G
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
80.25k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
163.59k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
72.83k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
7.34k (x1.12)
TOTAL
166.79k
324.01k (x1.94)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
22.09k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
24.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
10.94k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
22.89k (x4.19)
TOTAL
49.21k
80.52k (x1.64)
Multithread
3200G
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
124.44k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
167.06k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
74.34k (x3.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
7.2k (x1.32)
TOTAL
168.69k
373.05k (x2.21)
Performance/W
3200G
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
5739 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4