Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.8 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.8 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f82
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
14.08k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.56k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.19k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
16.71k (x3.06)
TOTAL
49.21k
58.53k (x1.19)
Multithread
3200G
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
86.62k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
168.1k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
43.51k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.16k (x0.94)
TOTAL
168.69k
303.4k (x1.8)
Performance/W
3200G
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4