Ryzen 3 3200G vs 5300U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f81
Core
Picasso
Lucienne
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
198.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
15.09k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
23.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
8.32k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
5.19k (x0.95)
TOTAL
49.21k
52.35k (x1.06)
Multithread
3200G
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
67k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
89.94k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
36.84k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
4.6k (x0.84)
TOTAL
168.69k
198.38k (x1.18)
Performance/W
3200G
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
13226 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4