Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-1235U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.8 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.8 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906a4
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
297.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
7.33k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
18.27k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
12.8k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
13.2k (x2)
TOTAL
33.79k
51.61k (x1.53)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
29.24k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
83.32k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
54.53k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
4.99k (x0.76)
TOTAL
108.01k
172.07k (x1.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
23.53k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
23.51k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
14.71k (x2.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
13.24k (x2.01)
TOTAL
48k
74.99k (x1.56)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
106.07k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
115.88k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
60.53k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
5.88k (x0.89)
TOTAL
165.91k
288.36k (x1.74)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
23.03k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
24.11k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
13.9k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
12.11k (x1.66)
TOTAL
48.63k
73.15k (x1.5)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
111.78k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
124.18k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
59.87k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
5.76k (x0.88)
TOTAL
166.79k
301.58k (x1.81)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
36.73k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
22.09k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
11.24k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
11.58k (x2.12)
TOTAL
49.21k
81.64k (x1.66)
Multithread
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
130.18k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
110.21k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
50.76k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.31k (x1.15)
TOTAL
168.69k
297.46k (x1.76)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
19831 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4