Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906a4
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
10240 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
185.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
6.95k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
16.28k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
10.49k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
9.95k (x1.5)
TOTAL
33.79k
43.67k (x1.29)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
14.97k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
51.01k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
30.47k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
8.59k (x1.31)
TOTAL
108.01k
105.05k (x0.97)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
20.87k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
20.74k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
11.32k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
8.32k (x1.26)
TOTAL
48k
61.26k (x1.28)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
45.12k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
60.59k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
28.48k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
14.06k (x2.14)
TOTAL
165.91k
148.26k (x0.89)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
15.63k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
20.2k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
9.94k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
8.06k (x1.1)
TOTAL
48.63k
53.83k (x1.11)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
35.72k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
56.41k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
25k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
12.48k (x1.9)
TOTAL
166.79k
129.6k (x0.78)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
37.56k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
21.13k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
11.35k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
10.31k (x1.89)
TOTAL
49.21k
80.34k (x1.63)
Multithread
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
73.97k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
72.37k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
29.61k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
9.65k (x1.76)
TOTAL
168.69k
185.6k (x1.1)
Performance/W
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
12374 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4