Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i5-11400T
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 108 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 108 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0671
Core
Picasso
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.51k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
14.2k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
7.63k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
6.06k (x0.92)
TOTAL
33.79k
31.39k (x0.93)
Multithread
3200G
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
7.4k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
31.37k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
18.11k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
10.23k (x1.56)
TOTAL
108.01k
67.1k (x0.62)
Performance/W
3200G
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
232 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1028 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
1662 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
973 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4486 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1654 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
8447 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4