| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon X3430


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.2 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
106e5
Core
Raven Ridge
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
55.66k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
1.75k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
3.95k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
2.29k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.66k (x0.91)
TOTAL
17.02k
10.65k (x0.63)

Multithread

2200U

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
6.81k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
15.37k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
8.9k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
4.42k (x1.56)
TOTAL
42.02k
35.49k (x0.84)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
6.41k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
4.27k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.38k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
2.67k (x0.91)
TOTAL
33.14k
15.74k (x0.47)

Multithread

2200U

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
25.19k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
16.76k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
9.33k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.37k (x1.44)
TOTAL
64.82k
55.66k (x0.86)

Performance/W
2200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
586 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4