| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 4.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306f2
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
13.1k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
11.91k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.83k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
3.83k (x1.18)
TOTAL
39.03k
33.68k (x0.86)

Multithread

2200U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
105.42k (x5.48)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
109.99k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
44.56k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
17.7k (x5.76)
TOTAL
68.8k
277.66k (x4.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
20.99k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
11.9k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.72k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.75k (x0.97)
TOTAL
36.77k
41.36k (x1.12)

Multithread

2200U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
172.62k (x8.58)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
110.03k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
44.06k (x4.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
16.93k (x5.12)
TOTAL
71.02k
343.64k (x4.84)

Performance/W
2200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4