Ryzen 3 2200U vs Pentium G3260
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
11.73k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
10.45k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.55k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.83k (x1.31)
TOTAL
33.14k
30.56k (x0.92)
Multithread
2200U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
22.99k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
20.53k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
8.82k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
6.55k (x2.16)
TOTAL
64.82k
58.89k (x0.91)
Performance/W
2200U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4