Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core m7-6Y75
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 68.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
406e3
Core
Raven Ridge
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
10.24k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
15.33k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.97k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
5.32k (x1.64)
TOTAL
39.03k
33.86k (x0.87)
Multithread
2200U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
16.78k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
25.09k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
6.14k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
5.58k (x1.81)
TOTAL
68.8k
53.58k (x0.78)
Performance/W
2200U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1283 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2418 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
680 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
205 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
4586 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3394 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5792 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1339 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
956 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
11480 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4