Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-4278U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-4278U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-4278U gets 76.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4278U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-4278U gets 76.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4278U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
40651
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
34.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
76.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
17.58k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
9.35k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.64k (x0.94)
TOTAL
36.77k
34.55k (x0.94)
Multithread
2200U
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
38.45k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
23.07k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
10k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
4.65k (x1.41)
TOTAL
71.02k
76.18k (x1.07)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1373 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
824 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
2721 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-4278U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11145 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4