Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a0653
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
4k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
14.19k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
4.62k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
11.03k (x3.77)
TOTAL
17.02k
33.84k (x1.99)
Multithread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
22.77k (x3.95)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
96.59k (x4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
31.65k (x3.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
2.45k (x0.87)
TOTAL
42.02k
153.46k (x3.65)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
12.61k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
17.94k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.83k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
10.81k (x3.69)
TOTAL
33.14k
46.19k (x1.39)
Multithread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
74.62k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
119.63k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
32.65k (x3.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.52k (x0.83)
TOTAL
64.82k
229.42k (x3.54)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
12.5k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
19.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.72k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
10.3k (x3.17)
TOTAL
39.03k
46.57k (x1.19)
Multithread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
74.58k (x3.87)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
126.96k (x3.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
31.76k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.5k (x0.81)
TOTAL
68.8k
235.8k (x3.43)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
19.98k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.57k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
11.31k (x2.91)
TOTAL
36.77k
57.85k (x1.57)
Multithread
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
136.69k (x6.8)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
135.25k (x3.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
32.76k (x3.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
2.48k (x0.75)
TOTAL
71.02k
307.18k (x4.32)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4