Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-4150
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-4150 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
40.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
20.5k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
11.78k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.52k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.48k (x0.89)
TOTAL
36.77k
40.27k (x1.1)
Multithread
2200U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
26.29k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
19.27k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
7.03k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
2.42k (x0.73)
TOTAL
71.02k
55k (x0.77)
Performance/W
2200U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
487 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
1019 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5856 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
11505 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4