Ryzen 3 2200U vs Celeron N5100
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906c0
Core
Raven Ridge
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
9.74k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
9.84k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.89k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.51k (x1.2)
TOTAL
33.14k
26.98k (x0.81)
Multithread
2200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
34.19k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
36.28k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
15.3k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.05k (x1.34)
TOTAL
64.82k
89.82k (x1.39)
Performance/W
2200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4