| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Celeron J4105


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 64.8 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
706a1
Core
Raven Ridge
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2018
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
1.68k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
5.29k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
2.75k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.44k (x1.18)
TOTAL
17.02k
13.16k (x0.77)

Multithread

2200U

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
6.39k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
20.02k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
10.22k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
4.94k (x1.75)
TOTAL
42.02k
41.57k (x0.99)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
4.9k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
7.26k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.75k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
3.32k (x1.13)
TOTAL
33.14k
18.22k (x0.55)

Multithread

2200U

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
18.84k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
27.45k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
10.35k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.85k (x1.6)
TOTAL
64.82k
61.49k (x0.95)

Performance/W
2200U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1366 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2088 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
666 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
4322 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3433 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4123 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1331 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
861 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
9748 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4