| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200U vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 2.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
13.77k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
22.62k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.91k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
4k (x1.03)
TOTAL
36.77k
45.3k (x1.23)

Multithread

2200U

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
50.44k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
94k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
25.64k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
4.11k (x1.24)
TOTAL
71.02k
174.19k (x2.45)

Performance/W
2200U
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200U
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4