Ryzen 3 2200U vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a50f00
Core
Raven Ridge
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
14.34k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
17.67k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
6.41k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
14.95k (x3.85)
TOTAL
36.77k
53.37k (x1.45)
Multithread
2200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
83.58k (x4.16)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
119.22k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
48.56k (x4.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
3.83k (x1.16)
TOTAL
71.02k
255.19k (x3.59)
Performance/W
2200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4