Ryzen 3 2200U vs 3250U
Description
Both models 2200U and 3250U are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
9.33k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
17.1k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.57k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
3.26k (x0.84)
TOTAL
36.77k
33.26k (x0.9)
Multithread
2200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
22.14k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
40.04k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
10.71k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
5k (x1.51)
TOTAL
71.02k
77.88k (x1.1)
Performance/W
2200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4