Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 3.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 3.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906a3
Core
Raven Ridge
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
225.65k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
6.93k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
18.76k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
9.46k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
8.17k (x2.79)
TOTAL
17.02k
43.33k (x2.55)
Multithread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
18.04k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
66.78k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
37.55k (x4.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
6.08k (x2.15)
TOTAL
42.02k
128.45k (x3.06)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
21.93k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
18.79k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
10.5k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
8.11k (x2.77)
TOTAL
33.14k
59.33k (x1.79)
Multithread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
61.07k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
86.08k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
41.08k (x4.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
6.02k (x1.99)
TOTAL
64.82k
194.25k (x3)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
21.11k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
19.61k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
9.53k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
7.72k (x2.37)
TOTAL
39.03k
57.97k (x1.49)
Multithread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
61.44k (x3.19)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
93.66k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
40.09k (x3.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
6.01k (x1.96)
TOTAL
68.8k
201.2k (x2.92)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
22.61k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
17.73k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.63k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
8.4k (x2.16)
TOTAL
36.77k
58.37k (x1.59)
Multithread
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
85.49k (x4.25)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
94.93k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
39.15k (x3.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
6.08k (x1.84)
TOTAL
71.02k
225.65k (x3.18)
Performance/W
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
5014 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4