Ryzen 3 2200U vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 2200U is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 2.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200U gets a score of 71 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 2.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906a4
Core
Raven Ridge
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
10240 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.77k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
71.02k points
185.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
6.95k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
16.28k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.63k
10.49k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
9.95k (x3.4)
TOTAL
17.02k
43.67k (x2.57)
Multithread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.77k
14.97k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.15k
51.01k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.28k
30.47k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.83k
8.59k (x3.04)
TOTAL
42.02k
105.05k (x2.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
20.87k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
14.02k
20.74k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
11.32k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.93k
8.32k (x2.84)
TOTAL
33.14k
61.26k (x1.85)
Multithread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.49k
45.12k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
31.32k
60.59k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
28.48k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
14.06k (x4.64)
TOTAL
64.82k
148.26k (x2.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
15.63k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
20.2k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
9.94k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.25k
8.06k (x2.48)
TOTAL
39.03k
53.83k (x1.38)
Multithread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.25k
35.72k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
36.27k
56.41k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.2k
25k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
12.48k (x4.06)
TOTAL
68.8k
129.6k (x1.88)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.73k
37.56k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
18.15k
21.13k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
11.35k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.89k
10.31k (x2.65)
TOTAL
36.77k
80.34k (x2.19)
Multithread
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.11k
73.97k (x3.68)
Test#2 (FP)
36.87k
72.37k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.74k
29.61k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.31k
9.65k (x2.92)
TOTAL
71.02k
185.6k (x2.61)
Performance/W
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1340 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
716 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
4735 points/W
12374 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3157 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5338 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
10814 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4