Ryzen 3 2200G vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 6.5 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 6.5 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306f2
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
February 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
20.96k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
11.74k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.61k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.4k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.87k
40.71k (x0.91)
Multithread
2200G
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
531.68k (x10.43)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
342.28k (x4.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
133.22k (x7.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
9.19k (x2.87)
TOTAL
157.54k
1016.36k (x6.45)
Performance/W
2200G
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4