Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a40f41
Core
Raven Ridge
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
21.04k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
22.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
10.21k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
24.27k (x6.84)
TOTAL
44.87k
77.93k (x1.74)
Multithread
2200G
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
158.65k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
215.86k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
89.45k (x4.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
14.77k (x4.62)
TOTAL
157.54k
478.73k (x3.04)
Performance/W
2200G
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4