| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i3-1220P


Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 2.6 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
906a4
Core
Raven Ridge
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
10/12
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2018
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
404.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
37.43k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
19.6k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
12.99k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
11.9k (x3.35)
TOTAL
44.87k
81.92k (x1.83)

Multithread

2200G

i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
178.85k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
153.82k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
69.38k (x3.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
2.69k (x0.84)
TOTAL
157.54k
404.74k (x2.57)

Performance/W
2200G
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
14455 points/W

Performance/GHz
2200G
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4