Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 2200G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2200G gets a score of 157.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c1
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.87k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
157.54k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
24.25k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.58k
21.63k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
9.09k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
7.23k (x2.04)
TOTAL
44.87k
62.19k (x1.39)
Multithread
2200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.99k
56.9k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
55.68k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.95k
19.29k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
6.09k (x1.9)
TOTAL
157.54k
137.96k (x0.88)
Performance/W
2200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
785 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
292 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2424 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
2200G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3716 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6102 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
959 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
12126 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4