Ryzen 3 1200 vs 3350U
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
13.25k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
21.67k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.79k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
3.98k (x1.45)
TOTAL
37.55k
43.7k (x1.16)
Multithread
1200
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
46.47k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
78.38k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
16.69k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
3.3k (x0.99)
TOTAL
117.81k
144.84k (x1.23)
Performance/W
1200
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4