| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 7.7 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
306e4
Core
Thuban
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/6
12 /24
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
May 2010
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.44k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
9.54k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
4.21k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.94k (x1.12)
TOTAL
12.64k
21.13k (x1.67)

Multithread

1035T

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
73.17k (x6.17)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
230.83k (x8.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
107.14k (x6.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
7.99k (x2.31)
TOTAL
58.11k
419.12k (x7.21)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
10.64k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
9.53k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
4.12k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.62k (x1.03)
TOTAL
16.77k
27.91k (x1.66)

Multithread

1035T

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
252.69k (x8.47)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
238.68k (x7.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
115.5k (x7.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
10.98k (x2.97)
TOTAL
80.19k
617.84k (x7.71)

Performance/W
1035T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
4753 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4