| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium N5000


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.5 times faster than the N5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
706a1
Core
Thuban
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
17.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
54.76k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
5.12k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
7.66k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.79k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.7k (x0.48)
TOTAL
16.77k
17.27k (x1.03)

Multithread

1035T

N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
17.56k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
25.71k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
9.45k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
2.05k (x0.55)
TOTAL
80.19k
54.76k (x0.68)

Performance/W
1035T
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
2927 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
341 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
9127 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1895 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
6396 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4