Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 137.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 58.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 137.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
a0653
Core
Thuban
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2010
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
369.97k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
4.3k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
16.56k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
5.25k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
12.61k (x3.59)
TOTAL
12.64k
38.72k (x3.06)
Multithread
1035T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
18.1k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
79.16k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
26.75k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
13.81k (x4)
TOTAL
58.11k
137.82k (x2.37)
Performance/W
1035T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
125 points/W
278 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
288 points/W
1218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
162 points/W
412 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
212 points/W
TOTAL
612 points/W
2120 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1474 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
830 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
2933 points/GHz
TOTAL
4076 points/GHz
9005 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4