| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
706e5
Core
Thuban
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
4.05k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
15.29k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
9.04k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
10.54k (x3)
TOTAL
12.64k
38.92k (x3.08)

Multithread

1035T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
9.05k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
33.88k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
15.34k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
6.74k (x1.95)
TOTAL
58.11k
65.01k (x1.12)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
7.07k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
10.55k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
5.27k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
5.66k (x1.61)
TOTAL
16.77k
28.56k (x1.7)

Multithread

1035T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
25.28k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
37.48k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
17.77k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
6.92k (x1.87)
TOTAL
80.19k
87.45k (x1.09)

Performance/W
1035T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4