| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Core i3-6100


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the i3-6100 gets 91.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
506e3
Core
Thuban
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
112.28k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
3.81k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
15.65k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
5.14k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.28k (x1.22)
TOTAL
12.64k
28.89k (x2.29)

Multithread

1035T

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
7.75k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
37.33k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
12.13k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.56k (x1.03)
TOTAL
58.11k
60.77k (x1.05)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
13.76k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
19.96k (x3.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
5.44k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.4k (x1.25)
TOTAL
16.77k
43.55k (x2.6)

Multithread

1035T

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
28.99k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
45.75k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
12.72k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.68k (x1)
TOTAL
80.19k
91.14k (x1.14)

Performance/W
1035T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
897 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
1787 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1469 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1189 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
11770 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4