Phenom II X6 1035T vs Celeron N5100
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
906c0
Core
Thuban
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
9.74k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
9.84k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.89k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.51k (x1)
TOTAL
16.77k
26.98k (x1.61)
Multithread
1035T
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
34.19k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
36.28k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
15.3k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
4.05k (x1.1)
TOTAL
80.19k
89.82k (x1.12)
Performance/W
1035T
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4