| | | | | | |

Phenom II X6 1035T vs Celeron N4020


Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
100fa0
706a8
Core
Thuban
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
25.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1.98k
1.25k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
4.57k
5.19k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.57k
2.56k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.61k (x0.46)
TOTAL
12.64k
10.61k (x0.84)

Multithread

1035T

N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
11.86k
1.68k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
7.29k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.39k
3.51k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.29k (x0.37)
TOTAL
58.11k
13.78k (x0.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
5.14k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
7.89k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.87k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.76k (x0.5)
TOTAL
16.77k
17.67k (x1.05)

Multithread

1035T

N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
7.46k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
11.61k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
4.27k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.91k (x0.52)
TOTAL
80.19k
25.26k (x0.32)

Performance/W
1035T
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
4211 points/W

Performance/GHz
1035T
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4