Phenom II X6 1035T vs A6 9210
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
670f00
Core
Thuban
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
4.87k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
10.38k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.59k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.38k (x0.68)
TOTAL
16.77k
20.22k (x1.21)
Multithread
1035T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
7.41k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
11.87k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
3.35k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
2.6k (x0.7)
TOTAL
80.19k
25.23k (x0.31)
Performance/W
1035T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4